Reference William Sanga, M. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES EMANATING FROM FACULTY TRANSITION TO A NEW LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Quarterly Review Of Distance Education, 17(1), 11-22.
In District 115 Canvas has been
referred to as “the Cadillac” of the Internet-based Learning Management System
(LMS). While it all seemed very exciting
when presented, I realized I didn’t know much about any LMS excluding the “free”
Google Classroom App. So instead of
diving right into it, I figured I would skim the surface first. “An Analysis of Technological Issues
Emanating from Faculty Transition to a New Learning Management System” by
Mapopa William Sanga allowed me to get my feet wet on two topics- LMS and
Canvas.
Summary
Summary
Introduction
According to Sanga (2016), LMS “is a
web-based application that supports teaching and learning by enabling
instructors to create and organize content for learners.” Thinking back to my experience, I have used
such a tool, but never as a teacher. It
provides many benefits to this 21st Century of learning: student engagement,
participation, organizes assessments, clearly communicates, materials are on
the tip of the students’ fingers, and accessing these tools allows students to
think differently.
It was noted when learning to use
any LMS, it is important to embrace technology and keep an open mind.
Purpose of Study
The study was conducted on 119 staff
members who had previously been using Desire to Learn (D2L) LMS, but
transitioned to Canvas. The University
provided workshops about Canvas to Staff from August 2013 until January
2014. Majority of the staff members who
took the four workshops were faculty that taught on-line classes.
During this study, they took
qualitative data by listing all issues in a Google document. The researcher, which was the teaching and
learning coordinator, synthesized the content and categorized the information
to help with the study.
Categories
Among the findings, they gave three
levels of issues. Category one was labeled as quick fixes, where the issue
could simply be resolved by showing how it is done. The second level was when
the support needed more time to solve the issue. This could have involved contacting
Canvas. Level three was the most
complex. This involved issues while
integrating software applications. The
external applications that the university used was Voice Thread, Panopto,
Turnitin & Grademark, and Respondus Lockdown Browser. The first two apps listed are mainly for
video and voice, whereas the Turnitin & Grademark is for plagiarism
tool. The last app is to lockdown
browsers, printers, etc. when taking an assessment.
Results
The faculty found Canvas to be very
beneficial after learning how to use it.
A challenge they continued to have been integrating the external apps. But overall, the benefits outweigh the
challenge.
“The gradebook and announcements were very helpful in managing
classes and student work” (2016).
Workshops will be necessary to learn
Canvas, but depending on staff proficiency with technology definitely plays a
factor on how quickly you may learn it.
Another factor in learning how to use Canvas, is motivation and personal
enthusiasm.
Reflection
Reflection
All in all, this informational study
offers positive insight of how to use and learn about this LMS. The jump next year to Canvas should be an
exciting time! Using patience, time, and support, either from Canvas or district, will help me succeed with Canvas Learning Management System.